Настоящий сборник объединяет работы известного канадского правоведа Б. Мелкевика, посвященные проблеме демократии в творчестве Дж. Ролза и Ю. Хабермаса. Автор анализирует критику, высказанную Ю. Хабермасом в отношении концепцииполитического либерализма его американского коллеги Дж. Ролза. Останавливаясь на нескольких ключевых темах, Мелкевик рассматривает критику модели политической и индивидуальной автономии Ролза, особенности его морального дискурса о демократии в сравнении с коммуникативной моделью демократии Хабермаса.Исследование подчеркивает некоторые недостатки теории Ролза в отношении к юридической современности и предлагает альтернативное решение, в большей степени ориентированное на интерсубъективные отношения, коммуникацию и демократию.This collection of essays by the outstanding Canadian scholar B. Melkevik focuses on the question of democracy in the works of J. Rawls and J. Habermas. The author analyses the criticism expressed by J. Habermas regarding the concept of political liberalism of hisAmerican colleague J. Rawls and on the defense of Rawls as to this concept. The author considers the criticism of Rawls’s model of political and individual autonomy, the peculiarities of his moral discourse on democracy in comparison with the communicative model ofHabermas’s democracy.This study highlights some of the drawbacks of Rawls’s theory in relation to legal modernity and proposes an alternative solution that is more attentive to individual sovereignty, intersubjective relations, communication and democratization as process.
Nastoyashchiy sbornik obedinyaet raboty izvestnogo kanadskogo pravoveda B. Melkevika, posvyashchennye probleme demokratii v tvorchestve Dzh. Rolza i YU. KHabermasa. Avtor analiziruet kritiku, vyskazannuyu YU. KHabermasom v otnoshenii kontseptsiipoliticheskogo liberalizma ego amerikanskogo kollegi Dzh. Rolza. Ostanavlivayas na neskolkikh klyuchevykh temakh, Melkevik rassmatrivaet kritiku modeli politicheskoy i individualnoy avtonomii Rolza, osobennosti ego moralnogo diskursa o demokratii v sravnenii s kommunikativnoy modelyu demokratii KHabermasa.Issledovanie podcherkivaet nekotorye nedostatki teorii Rolza v otnoshenii k yuridicheskoy sovremennosti i predlagaet alternativnoe reshenie, v bolshey stepeni orientirovannoe na intersubektivnye otnosheniya, kommunikatsiyu i demokratiyu.This collection of essays by the outstanding Canadian scholar B. Melkevik focuses on the question of democracy in the works of J. Rawls and J. Habermas. The author analyses the criticism expressed by J. Habermas regarding the concept of political liberalism of hisAmerican colleague J. Rawls and on the defense of Rawls as to this concept. The author considers the criticism of Rawlss model of political and individual autonomy, the peculiarities of his moral discourse on democracy in comparison with the communicative model ofHabermass democracy.This study highlights some of the drawbacks of Rawlss theory in relation to legal modernity and proposes an alternative solution that is more attentive to individual sovereignty, intersubjective relations, communication and democratization as process.
